Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Leahy: If Airlines want to defer, do it in 2010, not 2009!
FleetBuzz.com Worldwide Forums > Civil Aviation Discussions > Airbus vs Boeing!
Aurora
Or...not our problem. The airlines will just have to come to 'grips' with it!
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/comme...mentId=blogDest

QUOTE
In a briefing to analysts last week, Leahy said not all airlines are onboard for their scheduled 2009 deliveries, but that it is basically too late to do anything but finish building the aircraft and then putting it in storage.

Here's how Leahy explains it: "if someone is going to defer an airplane in 2009, and I don’t know if you are going to hear about that or not because we have the capability of building 18 airplanes now, we haven’t worked things out with all the airlines. But an airplane that you might hear being deferred in 2009, if you hear it, would be an airplane that is probably going to be built and put in storage and then the airline is just going to have to come to grips with that.”

If A380 customers want to defer later production that would be easier. Leahy notes since the airplanes aren’t built, there’s more flexibility in the system.

That’s true not just of the A380, he points out. Airbus is basically telling customers that if they want to defer orders, they have to focus on aircraft not yet built or in build – which effectively means 2010 or later delivery positions – and that they pretty much have to take 2009 slots.
James
I will gladly pay you Tuesday, for a hamburger today.
kimshep
Could this signal a new 'hard' line being adopted by the manufacturers ?

Time to claw back those 'delayed delivery' compensation payments so liberally handed out by Airbus for the A380-800 and the Boeing B787 ?

Let's face it. Frame manufacturers are businesses which, like any other, rely on a continuous stream of production and revenue. Storing planes is all very well ~ but does little for cashflow when orders have been signed, production undertaken and real money has been expended. Shareholders in Airbus and Boeing still expect results .. and await dividends, just like everyone else.

Methinks the 'price' of delaying deliveries based on the performance of economies .. just became more expensive ? After all, its the job of network, route planners and management to look, not just expansion by their carriers, but at the economic health and projections for the economy.

Seems like the 'buyers market, where manufacturers were falling over themselves to secure orders, may just have contracted .. in favour of manufacturers gaining back some pricing control. The problem is, in a time of contracting orders, will we see a reduction in the practice of manufacturers undercutting each other's list prices to attract new orders ? Or are we seeing some 'bottoming' of the market ?
errol wöbcke
Where is Mr. Leahy?
I have been with assiduity scrutinising industry journals and other perhaps lesser sources.
But there is hardly a word. Can anyone kindly steer me to a source whence I might ease this desolution?
Stitch
He was quoted this morning as noting that Airbus may not achieve the 300 orders for 2009 they originally projected. I expect Google News will provide links.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.